21.7.08

Widespread earnings woes reflect consumer fears

1 hour, 23 minutes ago

The deepening plight of the American consumer has started to take a big bite out of corporate earnings.

A number of major U.S. companies who rely on consumer spending warned about their results on Monday evening, including credit card company American Express Co, Macintosh computer and iPod maker Apple Inc and cruise ship operator Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

The breadth of the warnings, which also came from makers of chips and carpets, may signal that the credit crisis is quickly moving beyond housing and banks and into mainstream Corporate America.

"It's understandable that the U.S. consumer would be apprehensive with the circumstances -- weakness in housing, gasoline is up, the stock market is down and job insecurity," said Brian Gendreau, an investment strategist in New York for ING Investment Management Americas. "We may actually have a consumer-led recession -- which is rare."

The wrath of the credit crunch and housing collapse of the past year has largely been felt by middle- or lower-income people. But Monday's results reflected a broadening of fears.

American Express executives said that even customers with solid credit scores were facing difficulties and even the very affluent have in some cases cut back discretionary spending.

Monday's bad news came from a wide swath of sectors and raised concerns about how strong two of the major consumer events will be this year -- back-to-school season and year-end holiday spending.

"If you look at energy prices and things like that, it's not any big surprise the consumer has been cautious," said Subodh Kumar, chief investment strategist at Subodh Kumar & Associates in Toronto. "It's a splash of cold water on the theory that earnings will bounce back quickly."

ISSUES AT AMEX

The biggest disappointment on Monday came from American Express, whose quarterly profit fell 38 percent as it set aside more money to cover credit losses, sending its shares down more than 11 percent.

The company said it was no longer on track to boost earnings per share by 4 percent to 6 percent this year because the U.S. economy has slowed, particularly in June.

"While we have been able to generate substantial earnings and returns relative to many in the financial sector, we do not expect to meet or exceed our long-term financial targets until we see improvements in the economy," Kenneth Chenault, chairman and chief executive, said in a statement.

American Express customers tend to be wealthier than the average credit card user. If its customers are slowing down spending and increasingly delinquent on paying, the news could be worse for the less-prosperous customers of other lenders.

"What's getting people nervous is seeing this downturn affect their top super-prime customers," said Paul Hickey, co-founder of Bespoke Investment Group LLC in Mamaroneck, New York. "While it is not surprising that no one is insulated from the crisis, everyone is really concentrating on how even the best of the best aren't doing so hot."

SOUR APPLE AND TEXAS TROUBLES

On the technology side, Apple provided one of the biggest downers when it warned current-quarter earnings would miss Wall Street targets despite a better-than-expected third quarter.

Apple sold more than 11 million iPods, a 12 percent increase from a year ago and ahead of forecasts of up to 10.5 million. Sales of iPhones also topped forecasts. Apple sold 717,000 iPhones during the quarter, more than double the amount sold a year ago when the device was first launched.

While Apple has a reputation for giving conservative guidance, its view for the fiscal fourth quarter undercut analysts' expectations to a deeper degree than usual and its stock lost 9 percent after the market closed.

"It's a reaction to Apple's typical conservative guidance," Chris Whitmore of Deutsche Bank said. "Investors are likely to focus on the rationale for the conservative guidance."

Also in the tech world, Texas Instruments Inc scared away the bulls with a weak current-quarter outlook and disappointing past results, sending its shares down 7 percent.

TI is a key technology and consumer indicator, as it makes analog chips for everything from cell phones to industrial equipment.

It forecast earnings of 41 to 47 cents per share on revenue of $3.26 billion to $3.54 billion for the third quarter versus Wall Street's call for 51 cents on revenue of $3.57 billion.

The third quarter is often a strong one for TI due to back-to-school sales and as demand increases ahead of year-end holiday-season shopping.

"It's very worrying for TI and the semiconductor industry," Charter Equity Research analyst John Dryden said. "The outlook was as poor as the report."

Dryden said that while slowing wireless demand could only mean softness at a few companies, weakness in analog chips reflected badly on multiple industries. "When you're talking analog you're talking thousands and thousands of customers."

SINKING SHIPS?

As for higher-end discretionary spending, Royal Caribbean reported a narrower quarterly profit due to a doubling of fuel costs, and laid out a plan to save $125 million a year.

"Too much of our profitability is being eroded by the increase in fuel prices. This is unacceptable and we are evaluating everything we do to find ways to do it more efficiently and effectively," said Richard Fain, chairman and chief executive of the world's number-two cruise operator.

Royal Caribbean said net income was $84.7 million, or 40 cents per share, down from $128.7 million, or 60 cents, for the comparable year-ago period. Its fuel prices rose 55 percent.

As part of its cost-cutting, the company said it would eliminate about 400 shore-side positions.

(Reporting by Peter Henderson, Sinead Carew, Dan Wilchins, John Crawley, Jennifer Ablan and Michele Gershberg; Writing by Martin Howell and Patrick Fitzgibbons; Editing by Braden Reddall)

(http://news.yahoo.com)

17.7.08

Oil in 'Three black crows' pattern?

July 17, 2008 6:05 PM

Oil prices posted a bearish 'Three black crows' pattern over the last three days... Oil prices posted a bearish 'Three black crows' pattern...The pattern is a significant reversal formation after an uptrend. The pattern is considered highly reliable, but the risk is that oil is oversold in the short-term. The reversal is also confirmed by a break of trendline support that guided the move higher since mid-March at the 135.30 level. Also, the Tenkan line is crossing the Kijun line to the downside, generating a sell signal on he Ichimoku charts. The 135/138 area should contain any rebounds in oil and rallies should be sold from here on.--BD (www.forex.com)

14.7.08

InBev played smart to win defenseless Anheuser

Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:23pm EDT
By Jessica Hall and Martinne Geller

PHILADELPHIA/NEW YORK (Reuters) - InBev NV, armed with financing and promises to protect Anheuser-Busch Cos Inc's heritage, pursued its $52 billion target as a chess game with the final checkmate victory foreseen from the first move.

"The speed and efficiency with which InBev (its attack on A-B got a deal done just $5 (per share) ) above its initial bid price is impressive," Credit Suisse beverage analyst Carlos Laboy wrote in a research note on Monday.

InBev moved gently from the start, meeting with Anheuser Chief Executive August Busch IV in June 2 in Tampa to discuss a possible combination. It followed with an unsolicited offer on June 11 that included several concessions to soothe any pain for Anheuser-Busch.

Among the concessions in the initial $65 per share bid, InBev offered Anheuser seats on the combined company's board; promised to keep Anheuser's St. Louis, Missouri, home as the North American headquarters; and have the merged company's name reflect the heritage of the more than 150-year-old U.S. brewer.

InBev also said it would keep Anheuser's U.S. breweries open. The Belgian-based company kept all of those promises in the final agreement to buy Anheuser for $70 per share, creating the world's largest brewer which would be named Anheuser-Busch InBev.

"It was pretty much the standard example of how to acquire a company in an agreed deal when they weren't up for sale. The AB board did well, but the InBev tactics were spot-on in that they didn't have to face a messy, long drawn-out battle," said one source close to the deal.

"On the financing side in these difficult markets, they did well to pull together a high-class bank group," the source said.

FINANCING, POLITICS, LAWSUITS

Immediately after news of the possible deal leaked in the press, InBev's Chief Executive Carlos Brito met with U.S. politicians to ease any concerns about an international company buying the American icon and brewer of Budweiser beer.

"The InBev team played a good game in Washington. The first thing Brito did after it was leaked was to get over there and see the relevant senators," the source said. "Even though (Democratic presidential candidate Barack) Obama came out and spoke against it, that was contained."

InBev, though, reiterating through the month-long battle that it wanted to negotiate a friendly deal, showed that it would also push hard and set the stage to try to replace Anheuser's board. InBev proposed a slate of nominees that included Adolphus Busch IV, an uncle of Anheuser-Busch's current chief executive.

BUD'S WEAK SPOTS

Although some analysts credit InBev with running a smart campaign, others said that Anheuser had few defenses and was ripe for takeover given the slow growth of the U.S. beer market, the founding family's small stake and the brewer's weak performance.

"BUD made big missteps, but it made them two years ago when they declassified the board. Once BUD did that, they were always a sitting duck," said Andy Baker, a special situations analyst with Jefferies & Co Inc. "InBev won because all the pieces lined up."

Anheuser-Busch let their poison pill expire in 2004, and they declassified their board in 2006, according to FactSet MergerMetrics.

The firm gave Anheuser-Busch a "bullet proof" rating of 1.25, far weaker than the mean bullet proof rating for the Standard & Poors 500 of 3.7.

InBev and Anheuser traded lawsuits over the efforts by the Belgian brewer to challenge Anheuser's board. Anheuser also called the InBev takeover attempt an "illegal plan and scheme" to acquire Anheuser "at a bargain price."

The Anheuser lawsuit said InBev failed to disclose information about its Cuban business, an assertion that was mocked by analysts as a weak tactic to cast a negative light over InBev.

"If A-B had played its hand quite differently, we are certain that Brito would have run up as high as $75. Brito wanted the deal that badly," said Tom Pirko, president of California-based Bevmark, an industry consulting firm.

"A-B made a large mistake by alienating everyone with its legal machismo -- all pointless. It had no realistic defenses," Pirko said.

Anheuser also faltered by unveiling an alternative plan to deliver more than $1 billion in annual savings, adding that it would cut jobs, raise prices and boost share buybacks. Its stock failed to respond.

IT'S ALL ABOUT MONEY

Of course, money talks. InBev lured Anheuser to the bargaining table last week by raising its offer to $70 per share from $65 per share, a 27 percent premium over Anheuser's record-high stock price in October 2002.

August Busch IV had told a meeting of beer distributors that the brewer his family has controlled for more than a century would not be sold "on my watch." He'd now be on the board of the combined company.

"Some family firms have a tendency to be protective and August Busch once talked about how he was still trying to win his dad's respect," said Eleanor Bloxham, chief executive of Corporate Governance Alliance.

"Once you've gone public, the dynamic has changed and your obligation is to shareholders. It's best to be prepared for that," Bloxham said.

In the end, Anheuser accepted a friendly deal with a company it already knew and respected due to existing distribution agreements. It became a smart business move to allow InBev, which can expand Anheuser's brand in more international markets, to take over, analysts said.

"I credit the board of BUD for recognizing the situation and doing what was best for their shareholders. They did the right thing and said 'We'll swallow our pride. Swallow our home town pride,'" Baker said.

(Additional reporting by Eleanor Wason in London, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

(http://www.reuters.com)

Blog Archive

Search This Blog