6.8.08

Traders Are Buying Euro Dollar But Should I sell EUR/USD?

According to the FXCM SSI, a proprietary indicator that tracks the positioning of more than 30.000 traders, retail traders have been aggressively buying EURUSD.

Traders Are Buying Euro Dollar. Should I sell EUR/USD?

Yesterday,
the U.S. Federal Reserve left the Fed Funds rate unchanged at 2 percent as widely expected by the market and retail traders have been taking new long positions. In fact, long positions are up by 13.2% since yesterday and the ratio of long to short positions in the EURUSD stands at 1.73 as nearly 63% of traders are long. Yet, in the past, the SSI has been working really well as a contrarian indicator, particularly during trending markets, and the EURUSD could sell off more in the next few days.

ssi_0806-02


Why contrarian traders are normally more profitable?

Generally speaking, more long positions don't necessary suggest more confidence in the direction of the current trend. Indeed, when traders start having adverse movements against their position, many tend to increase the size of their position with the purpose to average down their entry price in one last attempt to recover from previous losses. However, the higher the number of short orders in a bull market the more dangerous is to take additional shorts because many of those traders who just entered the markets are also leaving their protective stop losses just above the current price action. The current positioning for the world’s most heavily traded currency pairs is located in the table below.

ssi_0806-03

What is the FXCM SSI?

SSI stands for Sentiment Speculative Index. The SSI is based on proprietary customer flow information. It is a real-time snapshot of the positioning of more than 30K retail traders given by the FXCM Execution desk. The absolute number of the ratio itself represents the amount by which long orders exceed short orders or vice versa. A negative number indicates that the majority of traders are net short while a positive number indicates that the majority of traders are net long. The FXCM SSI is published every week on DailyFX.com.

(http://dailyfx.com)


Freddie Mac sinks to $800m loss

By Daniel Pimlott in New York

Published: August 6 2008 13:59 | Last updated: August 6 2008 14:41

Freddie Mac slipped to a deeper net loss in its second quarter and revealed plans to slash its dividend as its credit losses doubled because of rising delinquency rates and higher foreclosures.

Freddie recorded a loss of $821m, or $1.63 a share, in the second quarter compared with a $151m, or 66 cents a share, loss in the previous quarter. The loss is its fifth in the last six quarters.The company made a profit of $729m in the same quarter a year ago, and revenues have fallen 28 per cent to $1.69bn since then.

Richard Syron, chief executive, said he still planned to raise capital even after Hank Paulson, the Treasury secretary, stepped in to bail out the company and larger rival Fannie Mae. The two giant mortgage financiers have taken billions of dollars of mortgage losses.

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, created by Congress to increase mortgage financing, own or guarantee 42 per cent of the $12,000bn in outstanding US home loans. The companies have massively expanded their role in the mortgage industry in the wake of the subprime crisis, after many other lenders went out of business or dramatically scaled back their mortgage operations.

Freddie shares fell 14.5 per cent to $6.87 in early Wall Street trading. Fannie, which is scheduled to report earnings later this week, dropped 11 per cent to $12.06.

Credit losses doubled to $2.8bn, while the company wrote down the value of subprime and Alt-A securities by $1bn.

It plans to reduce its quarterly dividend to 5 cents or less a share from 25 cents a share.

Congress last month extended authority to the US Treasury to buy unlimited equity stakes in Fannie and Freddie and offer them financing to bolster confidence after their stock price plummeted. The Federal Reserve was also given permission to lend directly to them.

Freddie said that its estimated regulatory core capital was $37.1bn at the end of the quarter, about $8.4bn above its statutory minimum requirement, and $2.7bn above the 20 per cent mandatory surplus applied by its regulator.

“We are capitalised above regulatory requirements and we continue to have open access to the debt markets,” said Buddy Piszel, chief financial officer.

“Freddie Mac was created to ensure the continued flow of funds to America’s homebuyers, and we are pleased to be fulfilling that important mission,” Mr Syron added. ”At a time of severe stress in the housing and credit markets, we are successfully providing critical liquidity and stability.

“We remain committed to raising $5.5bn of new capital and will evaluate raising capital beyond this amount depending on our needs and as market conditions mandate.”

5.8.08

Sen. McCain on whether Sen. Obama should have given a speech in Berlin

Questioning speech, forgetting Canada

Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:35 PM by Mark Murray

From NBC's Mark Murray
In his interview with NBC's Kelly O'Donnell, which will air on NBC's Nightly News tonight, McCain questions whether Obama should have given a speech in Berlin before becoming president.

"I would rather speak at a rally or a political gathering any place outside of the country after I am president of the United States," McCain told O'Donnell. "But that's a judgment that Sen. Obama and the American people will make."

However, on June 20, McCain himself gave a speech in Canada -- to the Economic Club of Canada -- in which he applauded NAFTA's successes. An implicit message behind that speech was that Obama had been critical of the trade accord. Also, McCain's trip to Canada was paid for by the campaign. Questioning speech, forgetting Canada Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:35 PM by Mark Murray

(http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com)

4.8.08

Does the state of the economy predict the election?

Trend - 8/4/08 Obama 316, McCain 209 Ties 13

Does the state of the economy predict the election? No, but it sure gives a hint. Here is a graph from Andrew Gelman, a professor of statistics and political science at Columbia University showing how the popular vote for the party incumbent in the White House relates to economic growth. There is clearly a strong correlation.

Based on this model, Obama is predicted to get 53% of the vote.

Hibbs graph

There are two clear outliers in the graph: 1952 and 1968. Both can be explained fairly directly. In neither year was the economy an issue at all. In 1952, the popular general Dwight Eisenhower, who won WWII, promised to end the stalemate that had been going on in Korea for two years. The hapless Adlai Stevenson wasn't running on continuing Harry Truman's economic policies. He wasn't even Truman's Vice President. In 1968, the economy was booming but the dominant issue was the unpopular war in Vietnam and the starting gun for the culture wars (fired by Mayor Daley's police force in what was later called a "police riot."). The economy wasn't on the agenda at all that year.

(http://www.electoral-vote.com/)

5 Yr Gas Prices (USA Average)

31.7.08

California judge rules early cell phone termination fees illegal


Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:48PM EDT


In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.

The preliminary, tentative judgment orders Sprint Nextel to pay customers $18.2 million in reimbursements and, more importantly, orders Sprint to stop trying to collect another $54.7 million from California customers (some 2 million customers total) who have canceled their contracts but refused or failed to pay the termination fee.

While an appeal is inevitable, the ruling could have massive fallout throughout the industry. Without the threat of levying early termination fees, the cellular carriers lose the power that's enabled them to lock customers into contracts for multiple years at a time. And while those contracts can be heinously long, they also let the carriers offer cell phone hardware at reduced (subsidized) prices. AT&T's two-year contract is the only reason the iPhone 3G costs $199. If subsidies vanish, what happens to hardware lock-in? Could an era of expensive, but unlocked, hardware be just around the corner? It's highly probable.

Of course, the carriers aren't going to take this lying down. Early termination fees are seen as critical to business, so carriers are expected to look for ways to reclassify the fees (such as by calling them "rates," part of the arcane set of laws that covers the telecommunications industry). The industry is also pushing for the federal government to step in and claim oversight over the early termination fee issue, which would invalidate any state ruling. The FCC is generally more tolerant of such fees, though Chairman Kevin Martin has proposed a plan whereby the fees are decreased the closer you are to the end of your contract.

The FCC may also buy the argument that, since carriers are nationally based (and consumers can use their phones anywhere in the country), that a single policy should apply across the nation, rather than creating a patchwork of legislation that could lead to confusion and chaos caused by having 50 different policies.

Is the early termination fee dead? Not yet, but it's looking a little haggard.


Oil Prices May Be Unlikely Savior For US Economy

Oil Prices May Be Unlikely Savior For US Economy

By Jeff Cox, Special to CNBC.com | 31 Jul 2008 | 01:17 PM ET


The US economy, desperately looking to stave off a recession, might find salvation in an unlikely place: volatile oil prices.

The recent decline in energy prices is one of the few bright spots in the sluggish economy, which took another hit Thursday as gross domestic product for the second quarter came in lower than expected and jobless claims showed a surprising and disturbing increase.

Friday's report on July employment is likely to paint an unflattering picture of the jobs market. Payrolls are expected to drop by 75,000, while the unemployment rate is forecast to inch up to 5.6% from 5.5%.

The drop in oil prices, which tumbled further on Thursday, has helped buoy the stock market and prevented the kind of freefall that such bad economic news normally precipitates.

"This might be the bursting of the commodities bubble," said Sean Snaith, director of the University of Central Florida's Institute for Economic Competitiveness. "The bursting of this energy bubble might be the salve that we need to get us through the rest of the housing correction without slipping into recession."

It might seem odd to think about oil actually helping the economy after spiraling prices sent gasoline past $4.10 a gallon at the pump. But the national average has dipped about 20 cents a gallon over the past month—about 5 percent—which provided some relief to consumers already strapped by surging food bills.

And while some analysts predicted stocks would continue to tumble through bear-market territory, the drop in oil has prevented a panic selloff and held index averages around key support levels.

That could be pivotal as most economists predict lackluster GDP numbers for the rest of the year now that the adrenaline dose from the government stimulus checks is wearing off.

"The question gets pushed back again, What's going to happen in the fourth quarter?" Snaith said. "Once the (stimulus) buzz wears off and the underlying fatigue comes to the surface, that's where oil comes in and might be a potential force that keeps things from slipping into recession."

Job Weakness a Big Hurdle

To be sure, there will be barriers along the way.

Oil could actually fall too quickly and spur consumers into old buying habits, sparking demand and renewing pressure at the pump. Geopolitical tensions also continuously loom throughout the big oil-producing nations, and a disruption in supply anywhere could send prices right back up.

And there's also the notion that it's a bit silly to talk about low oil prices when a barrel still costs about $125.

"Prices have to get substantially lower than this to undo the damage that has already been done," said David Ressler, chief economist at Nomura Securities in New York. "It's less damaging than at $150, but it's still a pretty onerous effect on consumer spending and household budgets."

(CNBC's Steve Liesman discusses the economy with President Bush's top economic advisors in video at left.)

Economists are particularly worried about the health of the consumer because of inflationary pressures. Some economists think Friday's employment report might not be quite as bleak as the jobless claims figure due to a lag between when employees are laid off and when they are actually removed from payrolls.

But even if that's the case, it's unlikely to allay fears about an economic slowdown.

"There are a lot of other indications that the job market has gotten weaker. I'm inclined to take this increase ... as real and indicative of a job market that's getting weaker by the day," Ressler said. "If that's the case then the economy's performance in the next couple of quarters is not going to be very impressive."

All About the Consumer

So with jobs increasingly scarce and inflation running high, any little bit will help.

If oil can drop even to $100 a barrel and gasoline gets back around $3 a gallon, the help for the consumer would be substantial, especially as people spend their stimulus checks and have to confront the difficult realities posed by the myriad economic issues.

"That's the problem with that kind of tax stimulus," said Tom Higgins, chief economist at Los-Angeles-based Payden & Rygel. "It only has a short-term impact. It doesn't impact the economy in a lasting way." But a sustained drop in gas prices would help in the long term.

"The real key to everything going on is inflation," said Ron Ianieri, chief market strategist at Options University. "What they're concerned about is the fact that I just drove down to the gas station and this week cost me less than the last eight weeks."

If housing can find a bottom--many economists believe it's close--the combination of falling energy prices and an expected easing in inflation could at least provide some hope heading into 2009.

"All of that could set the stage for a better performance in 2009," Ressler said. "The passage of time, too, is going to relieve some of the credit market strains, which are also holding back the economy. Time, in this case, will be a healing element."

URL: http://www.cnbc.com/id/25949060/


© 2008 CNBC.com

Blog Archive

Search This Blog